 
   
   
    
Stefan Dantchev
dantchev@dcs.qmul.ac.uk
 (1) There is a resolution proof of the Weak Pigeon-Hole Principle,  of size
 of size  
 for any number of pigeons
 for any number of pigeons  and any number of holes
 and any number of holes  .
.  
 (2) Any resolution proof of  of width
 of width   has to be of size
 has to be of size   , independently from
, independently from  .
.   
 These results give not only a resolution size-width tradeoff for the Weak
Pigeon-Hole Principle, but also almost optimal such trade-off for resolution
in general. The upper bound (1) may be of independent interest, as it has
been known for the two extreme values of  ,
,  and
 and   , only.
, only.